Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Interview Questions


What are the best technologies / frameworks to implement Web 2.0 applications
What the best frameworks to implement Web Services
Provide an example of a lightweight container
What Pattern is implemented by spring framework?
What is TOGAF?
Difference between JSF and Struts
Methods to measure application performance
Methods to measure application design / code quality
What is your approach towards design reviews?  name few things that you would do as part of design review?
How can you implement an NFR to always respond within ‘X’ number of seconds?
How will you troubleshoot the performance of web applications
How can you analyze the thread dumps and heap dumps
What kind of design considerations needs to be made to reduce application memory footprint?
Heap usage fine tuning using Garbage collection algorithms / parameters
How can we implement security on web applications, and web services?
How can you secure Web Services ? From internal / external service consumers?
How did you implement orchestration using a SOA product?
What are document based web services?
Difference between JAX-WS and JAX-RS (RESTful web services)
How can you secure Web Services? From internal / external service consumers?
What are the differences between SOAP, JAX-WS, JAX-RPC, AXIS, SAAJ, JAX-RS
What design considerations need to be made for developing web services for mobile devices?
What kind of monitoring tools have you used for SOA?
What are some alternatives to inheritance?
Difference between JRE/JVM/JDK?
What is synchronization and why is it important?
What is session Facade?
Is it possible to specify multiple JNDI names when deploying an EJB?
Can an EJB send asynchronous notifications to its clients?
Is there a guarantee of uniqueness for entity beans?
What is the difference between Java Beans and EJB?
Can I invoke Runtime.gc() in an EJB?
What is clustering? What are the different algorithms used for clustering?
What is the role of serialization in EJB?
Is it possible to share an HttpSession between a JSP and EJB? What happens when I change a value in the HttpSession from inside an EJB?

Canada Visiting Visa + H1B Visa Info

Documents an H1-B applicant needs to carry for Visa interview:
1. Passport and Passport copies of all pages
2. DS-160 confirmation page (Barcode printout) 
3. Original Visa interview appointment letter
4. Employer agreement / Employment contract letter signed by you and Employer Company (Original) / Contract between candidate and petitioner
5. Offer letter from the current Employer
6. Pay stubs for the last 2 years
7. Experience letter from the previous jobs
8. Employer letter/ Employment Verification Letter
9. Client Letter – Make sure Client mention Petitioner’s name in the Letter
10. W2’s and Tax Returns (for the entire period of your stay in USA)
11. Bank statements for last 2 years highlighting Direct deposits 
12. Updated Resume
13. I 20's (All Original)
14. OPT Cards
15. Work location pictures (not necessary)
16. Client ID/Badge, Employer ID/Badge
17. Time-sheets/status reports
18. Client location photos (optional) (not necessary)
19. Two passport size photographs as per specification
20. Work Experience Certificates, reference letters, appreciation certificates from previous or current employer/s (from the start of your career)
21. All Original Academic Credentials along with mark sheets(MS, BTECH, INTER, 10th)
22. SSN card
23. Driver’s license
24. H1B data collection and filing fee exemption supplement
25. H classification supplement to form I129
26. H1B visa petition and supporting docs filed with USCIS
27. I-797 – Original
28. I-129 &H1B cover letter
29. Copy of LCA
30. Previous I-797A and LCA (If any)
Probable Visa interview questions:

MASTERS Questions:

• Did you do your master's in United States? / Did you study in US?
• How long u been in states?
• What is your highest degree?
• What was your major?
• Where did you do your Masters? / Which university?
• When did you complete your MS? / When did you graduate?
• Can I see your MS certificate?
• Any Specific/ specialization courses u did in MS?

CPT/OPT Questions:

• What did you do after your Master's or Graduation?
• Where did you start working? / To which company did you start working?
• Which companies you worked for prior to the current employer company?
• Was your role in your previous job was xxxxx?
• Who have been your employers since you graduated?
• For which company did you work in the past?
• What were you doing before you were with your employer?

H1B Questions:

• How long you been working in United States?
• Is this your first H-1b?
• Since how long have you been on H1?
• From which place did you come to Canada? / Where did you come from?
• Where you on different project than the project when your petitioner filed you H-1B?
• Are you applying for the same company or other?
• What visa were you in USA before? On F1 - now on H1B status, came here for H1B stamping?

PERSONAL:

• Where do you live? / Where do you stay?
• Are you married?
• Do you have any arrested history or did any law enforcement officials contacted you? Never sir?
• When you last visited India?
• Have you ever been out of the country?
• What is your location right now?

EMPLOYER Questions:

• Are you working with XXXX company ? / Who is your employer? / Whom do you work for? / Who is petitioning for you today? / Who is your petitioner?
• Where is your employer located?
• Who is your CEO?
• Address of employer?
• What is your qualification for this job?
• What is your employer business? / What's your employer? / What does your employer do? / What is your company about?
• What do you do for your company? / What are your duties/roles and responsibilities? / What is your title and what do u do for your employer? / What is your designation? / What is your job? / What is your role in your company?
• Can you please elaborate the duties?
• How much duration u r working with your employer? / How long you been working with your employer? / When did you join your employer?
• What is your annual salary? / How much do you get paid? / How much is your income? / What is your pay?
• Do you discuss pay and wages with your employer? Yes, I do discuss, but as of now, am very happy with what he is paying.
• Why is your salary fluctuating? Why there is deduction on paystubs? / Why so much change in salary?
• Show me ur bank statements
• Why is your pay less in last year W2?
• Show me your W2 worked for your employer.
• Show me your pay stubs
• Where do you work at?
• How do you like xxxxx place?
• Do you have any issues/problems with your employer?
• How do you get your work assignments?
• Does your employer know about your projects?
• Whom do you report to? What you will report to your employer?
• How do you report to your employer? - Weekly status call, biweekly status report, stand-up calls when necessary
• Who will allocate the work? XXX person from my company and XXX manager from client will co-ordinate and XXX person from my company will allocate the work.
• Is there any gap (sitting idle) during change of the clients? / Are you on bench? / Does your company ever bench you?
• I can see that your employer does not pay on time? No I get pay on time. (Please be more confident this time. Say it’s always on time)
• Does your employer maintain employer-employee relationship? How?
• How many employees does your employer have, and any one work in same location with you?
• How your employer and Vendor are related?
• Are you satisfied with all the companies you work or worked for?
• Are you happy with your employer?

CLIENT Questions:

• From what time who have been working with your current client?
• How long with client and employer? / Same time with employer and Client?
• Do you have an end client? Do you have client letter?
• Who is your End client?
• What do they do?
• How long you been working with your end client? / How many months you worked for this client? / How much duration you are working with Client?
• Do you travel to client place? / Do you travel every week to client location?
• What is your position with the client?
• Where is your client located?
• How far Client is from your place?
• Do you work at a client site?
• Any other employees working from your company at client?
• What do you work at Client? / What is your work at client location?
Explain same as in client letter
• Do you have supervisor/manager at XXX client and what is his name?
• How long is the project with your client

VENDOR Questions:

• Do you have vendor? / Do you have any layers?
• What does your vendor do?
• Do you have any one between your client and employer
• How come your Vendor found your client?

PER DIEM Questions: ( Shankar - I have no idea about this can you explain about Per Diem?)

Why per diem is on your pay stub? (It does not count as salary. Your salary has to match or exceed the salary listed on the LCA)
Why you didn’t have per diem earlier?
Why it’s only starting from this year?
Why you dint have per diem when project started?

BACHELORS/F1 VISA Questions:

• Where you did your bachelors? Is it technical?
• Did you do your undergraduate in US? 
CLIENT QUESTIONS over the email or phone, if 221g received or received an email of further Administration processing:

In case consulate send an email to Client for further processing. You may prepare your answers and send them to your Client manager if he/she is okay with it to reply as you mention. Here are the list of questions:

• Who (you/preferred vendor/petitioner) supervises the applicant, and is such supervision off-site or on-site?
• Who does the applicant report to for work assignments?
• Who completes the applicant’s progress reviews?
Who reports to the Client Manager? How often Client manager being reported?
• If the supervision is off-site and performed by the petitioner, how does the petitioner maintain such supervision i.e. weekly calls, reporting to the main office routinely, or site visits by the petitioner?
• Who has the right to control the work of the applicant on a day-to-day basis if such control is required?
• Who determines the direction of the project?
• Who determines the applicant’s daily activities?
• Who provides the tools or instrumentalities for the applicant to perform the duties of employment?
• Who hires, pays, and has the ability to fire the applicant?
• Who claims the beneficiary for tax purposes?
• Who provides the beneficiary with employee benefits? 
Also, If 221 (G) is issued, U.S. embassy will try to reach the client manager and the employer asking the above questions so all the three candidate, employer and client needs to be on the same page. As soon as they reply to the questionaire via email or phone, the case will be processed and maximum time taken till now upto my knowledge is 2 to 4 weeks. Also, it is asked sometime to the client how soon do you need this candidate to be back and if the client replies that we need him back and there is work pending, this helps to process the case much faster. One thing is sure, once 221 (g) is issued then everything depends on the client and employers response.
PIMS 

Friday, February 22, 2013

Immigrants, advocates grow impatient with Obama on pace of changes to laws




Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano had just begun her remarks to a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on immigration when the first protester leapt to his feet.
“You have destroyed our community!” he shouted. Others in the audience joined him, chanting, “Stop the deportations!”
The anger at President Obama’s deportation policies among some of his otherwise most ardent allies could pose a surprising complication in coming weeks to the delicate negotiations to overhaul the nation’s immigration system that are now underway.
The Obama administration has deported more illegal immigrants than any in history, provoking deep political tensions that could narrow the president’s ability to make concessions Republicans will likely demand as part of a comprehensive deal.
Latinos are widely credited with helping Obama win reelection last November, and there is high optimism among advocates about the prospects for immigration changes championed by the president.
But the deep resentment over deportations on display at the Senate hearing last week has bubbled up repeatedly as Obama and his allies have tried to devise a coordinated strategy to push an immigration bill through Congress.
In a private meeting with Obama at the White House earlier this month, officials with the nation’s leading immigration groups confronted the president directly.
One advocate told the president that the Hispanic community was “demoralized” by ongoing deportations, according the several participants who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the off-the-record meeting.
Most of the attention on the possible pitfalls ahead for the immigration effort have focused on the likelihood that Republicans will balk at legislation that provides a path to citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants.
But the continued tension between Obama and immigrant groups could inject a different set of difficulties for the White House.
“In a sense, the president is on borrowed time,” said Chris Newman, legal director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network.
Newman said that for many immigrants, Obama’s policies were clearly preferable to Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, but “that doesn’t erase the fact that there is tremendous apprehension about the dissonance between the president’s rhetoric and his policies.”
Under Obama, about 400,000 illegal immigrants have been deported each year, a record rate. Administration officials contend the high numbers are linked to a massive expansion of resources devoted to immigration enforcement appropriated by Congress before Obama took office.
Administration officials say they’ve put in place policies that better prioritize deportation efforts, focusing on immigrants who have committed serious crimes, people who just recently crossed the border and others who had been caught repeatedly violating immigration laws.
Napolitano told senators last week that 55 percent of those removed in 2012 had been convicted of felonies or misdemeanors and 96 percent fell within one of the agency’s priority categories.
And last summer, Obama announced his administration would stop deporting many young adults who were brought to the country illegally as children and had committed no other crimes, a move that came partly in response to years of complaints from his immigrant supporters.
“This is something I’ve struggled with throughout my presidency,” Obama told an activist who asked during a Google chat last week what the president would do to stop families from being split by deportations while the congressional debate inches forward.
“The problem is that, you know, I’m the president of the United States. I’m not the emperor of the United States. My job is to execute laws that are passed. And Congress right now has not changed what I consider to be a broken immigration system,” he said.
”We’ve kind of stretched our administrative flexibility as much as we can,” he added. “That’s why making sure that we get comprehensive immigration reform done is so important.”
Asked once again in an interview Wednesday with the San Antonio Univision affiliate about the deportations, Obama offered a blunt answer: “At this point, I need Congress to act.”
A new Pew Research/USA Today poll shows in the wake of his recent legislative efforts, Obama’s approval rating among Latinos is at 73 percent, up from 48 percent in late 2011 amid disillusionment at the pace of progress toward legal change.
Still, the continued wariness about deportations may help explain the impatience Obama has telegraphed to Congress about the need for quick action on changes to immigration laws.
Members of a bipartisan group of eight Senators have been working on an immigration bill that they hope to submit for hearings in March. But President Obama has repeatedly insisted that if their efforts drag, he will submit his own bill to Congress.
The seriousness of that pledge was demonstrated over the weekend, as a draft of Obama’s back-up bill — including a somewhat easier path to citizenship for the nation’s 11 million illegal immigrants than what the Senate group has discussed — was leaked to USA Today. Republicans complained that the emergence of White House plan made the bipartisan talks more difficult.
At the same time, in the delicate dance of Washington negotiations, the public pressure from immigrants could also help Democrats win what they consider a better deal, by providing a pointed reminder to Republicans more interested in the demands of their conservative base that Democrats face pressures of their own from supporters.
“I’d be naive if I didn’t think pressure from the left helps us at the bargaining table,” said Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), a member of the Senate’s bipartisan working group who asked Napolitano pointed questions about the administration’s stepped-up deportations at last week’s hearing.
“We hear every meeting about pressure from the right. We have to be sure everyone is sensitive to the need to make concessions,” Durbin said in an interview.
The administration has long touted its stepped-up enforcement efforts, partly in an attempt to defuse Republican arguments that immigration change must wait until the border is more secure. Advocates believe that effort is bound to be futile.
Indeed, the argument has largely failed to persuade those who believe the system remains problematically porous and that the current debate is likely to result in amnesty for people who came to the country illegally.
Opponents, such as Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), argue that the Obama administration has inflated deportation statistics by including those caught at the border and returned home along with those arrested farther inside the United States.
Sessions contended that the anger from activists is part of a coordinated campaign to create the impression that Obama has cracked down on illegal immigration, even as the administration introduces what he termed “backdoor amnesty.”
“It is truly odd that we live in a time when the Executive Branch takes more seriously the protests of illegals against even weak enforcement of the law than it does the concerns of sworn law officers,” he said in a statement.
But immigrants and their advocates say despite public promises that criminals are being prioritized for deportation, on the ground, thousands of others are being caught up as well.
That was a central point of activists who raised the issue with Obama at the White House, spending the last 10 minutes of their off-the-record meeting urging the president to ensure his administration is following its own policies.
“I actually don’t trust them,” Natally Cruz, 24, an advocate from Phoenix arrested for protesting at last week’s Senate panel, said of Obama.
Cruz, who was brought to the country illegally when she was 8, was recently accepted for the administration’s new deferral program for young adults. But she said her mother could still be deported, and her uncle was swept up in a raid days before the hearing.
“I heard this four years ago, that there would be an immigration reform,” she said. “They talk and talk. All I see is more people being deported every day.”
Rep. Luis V. Gutierrez (D-Ill.), a longtime advocate of immigration changes, said people like him face a quandary.
They want to advocate on behalf of people like Cruz, even as they understand the need not to undermine the president’s leadership.
“He’s the quarterback of this,” Gutierrez said. “Do you nit at him at the same time?”
Peter Wallsten contributed to this report.
Discuss this topic and other political issues in the Post’s Politics Discussion Forums.

What are some other Famous / Cliche Sayings?

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.

A stitch, in time, saves nine.

A penny saved is a penny earned.

Where there's a will there's a way.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.

No news is good news.

It's better to light a candle than curse the darkness.

It's always darkest just before the dawn.

There are plenty of other fish in the sea.

There's a silver lining to every cloud.

There's nothing to fear but fear itself.

If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

The squeaky wheel gets the grease.

Don't count your chickens until they hatch.

A watched pot never boils.

Beggars can't be choosers.

A rolling stone gathers no moss.

Birds of a feather flock together.

Many hands make light work.

Too many cooks spoil the broth.

A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.

A fool and his money are soon parted.

Neither a borrower nor a lender be.

If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

Good things come to those who wait.

Early to bed and early to rise makes a man health, wealthy and wise.

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

You can't teach an old dog new tricks.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

some interesting links

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/crowdfunding-from-your-smartphone/2013/02/19/9e034aa4-7ad9-11e2-82e8-61a46c2cde3d_story.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-business/post/in-two-hours-crowdfunding-effort-draws-308000-of-interest-in-7th-street-building/2013/01/23/a77264bc-658f-11e2-85f5-a8a9228e55e7_blog.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/on-small-business/how-popularise-brought-crowdsourcing-to-dcs-commercial-real-estate-market/2012/06/01/gJQA0bf46U_story_2.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdsourcing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Mechanical_Turk

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Tech Predictions for 2013: It’s All About Mobile

If there is one theme that will be the topic of digital business this year, it is mobile.
ComScore, which tracks Web and mobile usage, published a report about what happened in 2012, and what to expect in 2013.
It shows that the effects of a movement toward mobile are everywhere, from shopping to media to search. According to the report, “2013 could spell a very rocky economic transition,” and businesses will have to scramble to stay ahead of consumers’ changing behavior.
Here are a few interesting tidbits from the 48-page report.
The mobile transition is happening astonishingly quickly. Last year, smartphone penetration crossed 50 percent for the first time, led by Android phones. People spend 63 percent of their time online on desktop computers and 37 percent on mobile devices, including smartphones and tablets, according to comScore.
Just as they compete on computers, Facebook and Google are dominant and at each other’s throats on phones.
Google’s map app for the iPhone, which had been the most used mobile app, lost its No. 1 spot to Facebook after Apple kicked Google’s maps off the iPhone in October. Now, Facebook reaches 76 percent of the smartphone market and accounts for 23 percent of total time spent using apps each month. The next five most used apps are Google’s, which account for 10 percent of time on apps.
As smartphone use continues to increase, companies such as Google must compete to secure influence in the app market.Justin Sullivan/Getty Images As smartphone use continues to increase, companies such as Google must compete to secure influence in the app market.
As mobile continues to take share from desktop, some industries have been particularly affected, and they are seeing significant declines in desktop use of their products as a result. They are newspapers, search engines, maps, weather, comparison shopping, directories and instant messenger services.
The most visited Web sites are not so surprising: Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Facebook and Amazon. Facebook continues to take up most of our time online.
But there were a few surprises from younger, smaller Web companies. Tumblr was No. 8 on the list of sites, ordered by time spent on them. And several Web sites were breakout hits last year, as measured by growth and visitor numbers: Spotify (music), Dropbox (online storage), Etsy (shopping), BuzzFeed (news), JustFab (shopping), SoundCloud (music) and BusinessInsider (news).
Search, one of the biggest and most reliable Web industries, is at a crossroads, comScore said. Even though the search market continues to be extraordinarily profitable, there is a desire for it to evolve and offer new services to users.
Here is some evidence: Searches on traditional search engines, dominated by Google, declined 3 percent last year, and the number of searches per searcher declined 7 percent. Yet searches on specialty sites, known as vertical search engines, like Amazon.com or Whitepages.com, climbed 8 percent.
Social search, based on what users’ friends like, has put Facebook and Google on a “collision course,” comScore said, particularly in searches for local businesses like restaurants.
In social networking, the visual Web, as comScore calls it, has transformed the landscape. Pinterest, Tumblr and Instagram, all of which emphasize images, each gained more than 10 million visitors last year.
Last year was also pivotal for online video, comScore said, as viewers increasingly seek the ability to watch video when and where they want. Watching TV shows online helped last year break viewing records, especially during the Olympics.
In the United States, 75 million people a day watch online video and stream 40 billion videos a month, and viewing is driven by YouTube.
There has also been a turning point for video ads. They cost more than typical ads, and have always lagged behind viewership. But in 2012, 23 percent of videos were accompanied by an ad, up from 14 percent the year before. More TV ad dollars are coming to online video, comScore concluded.
Though e-commerce spending grew 13 percent last year, it was a disappointing holiday season online, largely because of economic pressures. Purchasing on mobile phones is beginning to make a dent in e-commerce, comScore said, with mobile shopping accounting for 11 percent of e-commerce in the fourth quarter of 2012, up from 3 percent in the period two years earlier.

Other countries court skilled immigrants frustrated by U.S. visa laws



CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — The contraption sits in a basement lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, a mishmash of hoses, wires, whirring pumps and a 12-foot-high plastic tower filled with steam and dripping water, all set on plastic milk crates.
It looks like a high school science project, but it was developed by two postdoctoral mechanical engineers at MIT. And it just might be a breakthrough that creates wealth and jobs in the United States and transforms the white-hot industry of oil and natural gas hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.
That is, as long as the foreign-born inventors aren’t forced to leave the country.
Anurag Bajpayee and Prakash Narayan Govindan, both from India, have started a company to sell the system to oil businesses that are desperate for a cheaper, cleaner way to dispose of the billions of gallons of contaminated water produced by fracking.
Oil companies have flown them to Texas and North Dakota. They say they are about to close on millions of dollars in financing, and they expect to hire 100 employees in the next couple of years. Scientific American magazine called water-decontamination technology developed by Bajpayee one of the top 10 “world-changing ideas” of 2012.
But their student visas expire soon, both before summer, and because of the restrictive U.S. visa system, they may have to move their company to India or another country. “We love it here,” said Bajpayee, a cheerful 27-year-old in an argyle sweater and jeans. “But there are so many hoops you have to jump through. And you risk getting deported while you are creating jobs.”
Much of the immigration debate in Washington has centered on the 11 million undocumented migrants in the country. But, from the halls of MIT to the boardrooms of Silicon Valley, business and academic leaders are more focused on what they call an even greater threat to the U.S. economy: immigration laws that chase away highly skilled foreigners educated in U.S. universities, often with degrees funded by U.S. taxpayers.
While other countries are actively recruiting foreign-born U.S. graduates, the United States has strict limits on visas for highly skilled workers that often put them on waiting lists of many years. And unlike Canada and other countries, the United States offers no specific visa for young entrepreneurs like Bajpayee and Narayan who want to start a business in America.
“We train these people and then we push them away, while Chile and the U.K. and Canada are coming in to recruit them,” said Bill Aulet, managing director of the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship. “These are people who are creating jobs. It is so outrageous to me.”
Solution is gridlocked
The situation exemplifies the worst in Washington gridlock: Even when both sides agree on something, they can’t agree on how to make it happen.
President Obama supports making it easier for foreigners who earn master’s degrees or PhDs at U.S. universities to get green cards, as does a bipartisan group of U.S. senators working on reform. A solution is stuck in partisan infighting, however, over how to craft comprehensive reforms that address both skilled and unskilled immigrants.
Republicans have proposed increasing the number of visas for skilled immigrants by cutting the number available for unskilled immigrants — a trade-off that Democrats oppose.
Obama and some in Congress have also proposed creating a “start-up visa” for foreign entrepreneurs, similar to what Canada and other countries offer. Many applaud this plan, but not all.
“It’s a stupid idea,” said Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports tighter immigration controls. “What is an entrepreneur? Businesses come and go.”
That kind of talk is heresy in Silicon Valley, where business leaders have begged the government for more-welcoming immigration laws. The biggest obstacle to growth in America’s tech industry, they say, is a desperate shortage of highly skilled workers in the STEM fields: science, technology, engineering and mathematics.
“No matter how many visas they gave out, those people would all get jobs and we would still need more,” said Margit Wennmachers, a partner at Andreessen Horowitz, a major venture-capital firm in Silicon Valley. “It’s not like we need 10,000. I think we could do with a million and still be hungry.”
According to a study by the Brookings Institution, about half of all PhDs working in science and technology are foreign-born. And about 40 percent of all MIT graduate students are from other countries.
Leon Sandler, executive director of MIT’s Deshpande Center for Technical Innovation, said it costs about $250,000 to educate a single PhD student and the U.S. government pays for at least 80 percent of MIT’s graduate research.
“Essentially we are funding their research, spending a quarter-million dollars in taxpayer money; then we make it hard for these people to stay here,” said Sandler, whose group helps start-ups and provided nearly $150,000 to support Bajpayee and Narayan. “If you want more innovation in this country, fix the visa situation.”
A global bidding war
Countries from Canada to Germany to Australia to Singapore are enthusiastically courting foreign entrepreneurs with relatively easy visas. Some offer cash.
China has given bonuses of up to $150,000 to thousands of highly skilled expatriates who have come home to work or start businesses. Chile is luring top talent with $40,000 in capital, free office space and a quick visa through its “Start-up Chile” program.
Officials said the program has had more than 5,600 applicants since it started in 2010; it has accepted more than 1,000 entrepreneurs from 51 countries. The program has attracted dozens of foreign-born graduates of U.S. universities, who have started 47 businesses there.
On April 1, Canada plans to launch a start-up visa program giving entrepreneurs immediate permanent residence. Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney told reporters last month that the program was designed, in part, to poach foreigners from the United States.
“We see the bright, young, international tech developers in the U.S. who are stuck on temporary visas as an immediate market, if you will, for this program,” Kenney said at a Jan. 25 news conference in Toronto.
Many foreign governments and companies are actively recruiting in U.S. centers of higher education from Cambridge, Mass., to Stanford, Calif., offering top graduates alternatives to the expensive, lengthy, difficult and, some say, even hostile U.S. visa system.
Switzerland, for example, has a “science consulate” with a sleek, modern storefront on a street between MIT and Harvard devoted to promoting Swiss companies and universities to top students.
A Silicon Valley company, Blueseed, has proposed a novel way to skirt U.S. immigration laws: It is trying to create a tech hub on a leased cruise ship in international waters 12 miles off the California coast. Entrepreneurs could run their start-ups there with no need for a visa, and ferry to Silicon Valley on visitor visas to meet with investors or clients.
More than 1,000 entrepreneurs from 64 countries have expressed interest, and investors have put up more than $400,000, said Blueseed executive Dario Mutabdzija, a U.S. citizen who came to the United States as a refugee from the former Yugoslavia.
“The current U.S. laws are not appropriate for the current economic reality,” Mutabdzija said. “Blueseed has become a poster child for that.”
Other options elsewhere
Bajpayee and Narayan want to stay in the United States. They don’t want to move to Chile or Israel or Singapore, which seem too small and too far from their main markets in the U.S. oil and gas fields. But, they said, if they can’t legally stay in the United States, they have other options to consider.
Their biggest financial backer is Indian and is pressuring them to build their company at home. Chinese investors want them to locate in China. Brazilian mining company officials have called, too, hoping to lure them to Brazil. They have thought about moving to Australia.
“If it doesn’t happen in the U.S.,” Narayan said, “we will make it happen somewhere else.”
Bajpayee came to the United States from India 10 years ago, when he was 18, drawn by the dream of attending a U.S. university. He ended up at the University of Missouri because his uncle lived nearby.
At first his English needed work, and he didn’t understand many of the jokes his new American friends were making. So he said he started watching American movies, sometimes three a day. “Forrest Gump.” “The Godfather.” “American Pie.” “Animal House.” Anything starring Will Ferrell.
By the time classes began in the fall, he said, he had watched 85 films and could make his own jokes in fluent American English.
“Living in the middle of Missouri really forced me to learn the language and the culture,” he said. “In New York or California, there are lots of Indian people. But in southern Missouri, there were just lots of nice Missouri farm boys. You have to learn to enjoy a football game.”
He earned a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering in three years, then was accepted at MIT, where he finished a master’s and earned his PhD last summer. His research was paid for partly by U.S. government grants and partly by the Deshpande Center.
During his studies, he worked with a professor who was researching the freezing of human cells. They were looking for a way to remove moisture from cells so they could be frozen without damage.
Bajpayee discovered that one of the processes they were using was unexpectedly effective at removing contaminants from water. A professor asked him: Could that technique be used to desalinate seawater or clean contaminated water, perhaps producing drinking water on a large scale?
“At MIT, no idea is too wild or too revolutionary to consider,” said Bajpayee, who exudes an inventor’s optimism and a salesman’s charm. “And this worked.”
Narayan, 28, came to MIT in 2008 and was working on his own water-purification research when he met Bajpayee. Much more reserved than his gregarious partner, he had grown up in southern India in an apartment building with no running water. He said his life’s dream was to create a cheap way to provide safe drinking water to millions of people.
The two engineers pooled their efforts. Their plan is to first market Narayan’s system, the one bubbling away in the MIT basement, and keep working to perfect Bajpayee’s.
They said their systems could make fracking more cost-efficient and environmentally safe. Robert MacKenzie, an oil industry analyst with FBR Capital Markets, said oil companies create seven barrels of wastewater for every barrel of oil they produce. If Bajpayee and Narayan have found a way to fully clean that wastewater, cheaply and on an industrial scale, MacKenzie said, “That could be the Holy Grail.”
Business dreams at risk
When he arrived in the United States, Bajpayee was issued a five-year student visa, which he renewed for a second five years. It expires in May.
Now, with a business and millions of dollars of financing on the line, he wants the security of permanent residency. But all his routes to a green card are difficult.
Last September, after he finished his PhD, he was granted one year of Optional Practical Training (OPT), for those on student visas, which allows him to stay in the United States for a few months longer. He could apply for an OPT extension for 17 months more, an option open to people with degrees in the STEM fields.
But that comes with a tough restriction: After his student visa expires in May, if he left the United States for any reason — to visit family, to attend a business meeting — he would have to go back to India to apply for a new student visa.
The law says that people on student visas must intend to leave the country after their studies end. But because Bajpayee has started a company in the United States, lawyers tell him he could easily be denied a new student visa.
The most common visa for high-skilled immigrant workers is the H1-B, for foreigners working at a U.S. firm. But immigration lawyers said the government often denies those visas for people working for businesses they started themselves — so Bajpayee would probably be rejected.
His most promising option, he said, would be to apply for an EB-1 visa for people who have “extraordinary ability.” Those visas are among the most difficult to get. They require applicants to show that they are “one of a small percentage who have risen to the very top” of their field. They must have won a “major, internationally recognized award,” such as a Pulitzer Prize, an Oscar or an Olympic medal. If they have no such award, they must have been published in prestigious scientific journals or have made other extraordinary contributions in their field.
Of the 140,000 employment-based immigrant visas given each year, only about 2 percent are in that category.
Bajpayee and Narayan have systematic plans for how to perfect their product, manufacture it, sell it and grow their business. But when it comes to getting a green card, their strategies are less scientific.
“Prayer,” said Narayan.
“My strategy,” Bajpayee said, “is to get the best possible lawyer in Boston and pay them as much money as they desire.”